Brad Miller

Posts Tagged ‘devil’

Conservatives are being played by Administration-Catholic Contraception Flak

In True nature of the State on February 10, 2012 at 12:02 am

Does anyone think the leaking of the Catholic Church contraception healthcare loophole closure is not coordinated to split the Republican opposition?

I have no hard facts on this but think about it for a second. How would this help the administration? Why would they want to give a bump to Santorum?

I believe they are doing it to siphon money away from Romney. I know Romney is Obama-lite but the Obama acolytes in the White House would still like to continue to live in the court of Washington so they put out this red meat for the religious Conservatives to gin up support for Santorum.

Or was this all  done to divert our attention away from the bigger picture. Or is it just a play to  weaken the Catholic Church which by the way has never been and still is not about freedom, by forcing them to submit to the secular authority?

I don’t know. But Government is evil so whether this is unintended or intended consequences the result is the same; Less Freedom, More Government.

I don’t think the Catholic Church will back down. The Catholic Church relies on force to compel submission just like the Government does. It uses the threat of spiritual death to compel submission while the Government uses the threat of physical death to gain submission.

This all rests not on religious freedom, but upon the overarching concept of individual freedom. That is the only kind of freedom. Religion is thought, speech originates with thought, economic freedom rests on freedom of thought. Personal freedom to think and act as one chooses is the only freedom, whether it means I defend myself with an Abrams tank (if I can afford it) or worship as a Druid and dance naked in a corn field around some granite slabs. It’s about freedom from Government so I can live my life and do as I please as Long as I don’t infringe upon the rights of others to do the same.
Or like Rand said I can do whatever I want as long as I don’t initiate force against another.

Freedom is not divisible. At least with the Catholic Church which for most of its existence used the force of government to compel submission is now more or less a voluntary institution.

But  let us not canonize the Catholic Church as a beacon of individual freedom who all of a sudden has figured out the Government is trying to tell people how to live.

Where has the Catholic Church been about what the Government does with the stolen parishioner tax money? Where was the outrage when that tax money was used to buy bombs and bullets which killed thousands of women and children around the world. Where was the outrage when the Governmet began openly assasinating people and detaining them without trial?  I hate selective outrage. Just because this hits them in their money maker  the Catholic Church is up in arms.

Taxes are theft. The Church can’t come out against it because people might just see how tithing and taxation are a lot alike. Both support huge unproductive bureaucracies and come with a stiff penalty if they aren’t paid.

I don’t care what people believe. Like Thomas Jefferson wrote “as long as they don’t pick my pocket or break my leg ” people can do what they want.

The individual right to choose how to live is the ultimate freedom and encompasses everything from Religion to Economics. They are the same. So when anyone complains about a specific violation of Natural Rights that infringes on their power base let us be careful and not give into the small narrow debate the elites like to trap us in. If we are constantly focused on the minutia of an isolated instance of Government destruction of liberty, this allows them free rein to print trillions of dollars out of thin air, bail out their friends on Wall Street, destroy community banking in America, destroy innovation with regulations, kill anyone anywhere in the world, declare the U.S. a battlefield and give the president the ability to detain without trial anyone he deems a terrorist.

So let the outrage on this be tempered. The bigger issue is individual Freedom and the evil of Government not the evil of Contraception.

I may be hard on the Catholic church but I hate the hierarchy and the smugness and the arrogance of anyone which tells anyone how to live, especially when the priests don’t deal with any of the mess of emotions normal people do.

I feel the same way about monks. I think it’s a cop-out to live cloistered. The real test of “faith” of oneself or of ones world view is in by interacting with other people in the world.

I don’t want to tell anyone how to live. I don’t want anyone to believe anything I write . All I hope to do is to get folks to think and find out for themselves what is the truth.

Government of any kind is the problem whether it’s clothed in Secular or Religious traditions. It always seeks power to control the individual. Live your life. Listen to yourself. Trust yourself.

I like to live by the golden rule. I don’t always. But that is my standard.

What is the Government’s standard it lives by? Steal and kill and lie all you can for if you don’t someone else will and then they will have the power. Isn’t odd that when the Devil tempted Jesus he offered him the “Kingdoms” of the world. He offered him control of the governments of the world. He didn’t say the world but the “kingdoms” of the world. Jesus refused to take the reigns of Government to control people. That is a powerful statement especially in regards to the context when that was written. The Roman Empire was expanding across the known world. Like the U.S. today.

How amazing is that? How many politicians if given that opportunity would not jump to take over the “kingdoms” of the world? I know they are all positioning themselves to do it. Religion and Government have been in league for millenia. Only when The U.S. got started did it become separated and it was always the Government and Church in league that was the problem. By the way if you missed it I believe Government is evil. Anyway back to the Catholic Contraception Conundrum.

I don’t think it was by accident that this was made newsworthy when it happened. The  Santorum campaign is unorganized it lacks funding and a nationwide presence. Obama and his minions are trying to give him a push so money is funneled into his campaign and away from Romeny.There are not unlimited funds every dollar the Republican losers spend is one less dollar Romney will have in his Campaign war Chest.

I don’t know. Maybe there is just so much Collectivist bull…t in the Health Care bill we are going to see more and more of this coming out. But it’s not just about Obama Care its about the very nature of Government. I think we should reject the very notion that we need any type of Government just as Jesus rejected the offer by the Devil.
Brad Miller

AdvocateofLiberty

Can you chain down the devl? Exploring the notion of limited government

In True nature of the State on July 23, 2011 at 12:03 pm

Limited Government: Utopian Dream or Acheivable Goal?

The entire history of humanity, with a few exceptions, is the story of the expansion of Government Force and the subsequent reduction in the exercise of Individual Liberty. The most notable of these exceptions of course was the American Revolution.

For the main tenet of the Revolution was that individual rights did not come from the State,  but from God. This was an earth shaking revelation. It was a declaration for the first time that by our very existence, we have the God given rights of Life, Liberty and Property.

Government’s purpose for those who favor limited government is to protect these rights. This is  sometimes refered to as  a ”NightWatchmen State”. One that is constituted to serve a purely defensive function of preserving life, liberty and property.  But as Murray Rothbard points out time and again, in order for Gorvernment to perform this defensive function it must violate the rights it was instituted to protect. It violates it’s stated purpose of propecting property because it forcibly plunders property in order to protect it.  

For me the ideal world would be one of voluntary exchange devoid of external coercion, that is the Free Market Society or Anarcho-Capitialist society.  The only difference is that the “NightWathcmen”  will be private enterprises selling its defensive services on the Free Market. Why wouldn’t  indivduals pay for police, courts etc, monthly like they pay their insurance premiums or their cable bill? 

There are a lot of smart folks who I admire who advocate for a minarchist or minimal level of government, or the “NightWatchmen State”. They include Ludwig von Mises, Leonard Read, Frederic Bastiat and Ayn Rand. I’ve learned a tremendous amount about the ideas of Liberty from these folks. But even they fail to articualte in my opinion a satisfactory definition of “limited” or “minimal” government. This leaves the door open to “unlimited” government which we are rapidly advancing towards in this country.

The solution for me is to eliminate any question of how small or limitied government should be by eliminating it all together. Murray Rothbard and others who pioneered the Anarcho-Capitalist Society developed this idea not to counter the “left” and Collectivism, but rather to counter the growing conservative statism that had been developing since WWII. The current crop of those on the Right (those excluding the minarchists – or libertarians like Ron Paul), have gone way beyond advocating for even the “NightWatchemen State”. They embrace fully the idea of Social Security, Progressive Taxation, and Eminent Domain. They offer only a slower trek down the “road to serfdom” then those who advocate for total government control of society.

 And when people say that the Constitution will “chain down government” it reminds me of the beginning of  Milton’s Paradise Lost where the devil is chained in Hell by God. But  still the devil broke free. If the devil exists, then I believe its a much better option to eliminate him rather then run the  risk  of having him break free of his chains. I think the same theory applies to government.

I find it fascinating to listen to politicians or talking heads when they speak of “small” or “limited” government. It is always in the vaguest of terms because they know like God, that you can’t chain down the Devil.

Liberty is not divisible. Government can not protect Liberty by violating it. That is why I advocate for Maximum Individual LIberty which for me can only be acheived within a Free Market Society devoid of the State.

And that’s my take.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.